Background Noise: I'm Not Okay, my chemical romance
Last website visited:
Mood: hmm
Right now i want...
Occasionally i take personality tests. Yes, more tests... i must miss school. The interesting thing about my tests, however, is that my results differ based on my current situation (project mode, listening to friends, etc).
For example, i just took a(nother) Jung - Myers-Briggs personality test. My results?
I'm an ENTJ, a Rational, person, more commonly known as The Field Marshall. Field Marshalls make up less than 2% of the population.
Curious that, while accurate, especially in certain situations (MUSKET i'm talking to you!), it doesn't begin to cover the other side of my personality: the me that is happy to hang around and help out when being a Field Marshall isn't required. So i took another test, a temperment sorter trying to answer as if i wasn't in the ending stages of shipping an application. The answer?
I'm a ESFJ, a Guardian, specifically a Provider. Another near-rarity, weighing in at 10% of the population.
So how can i be both a Rational and a Guardian (and no, the answer is not that i'm Aisling Grey)?
Here's the thing: to me, this makes complete sense. I will always deal more with the external world than with the internal one (i knew i was a libra!), and i do tend to make plans and organize solutions, there's no helping that.
But i've found that i can choose how i percieve the information from my environment and how i process that information. I would argue that these changes do not have to be made at the same time, but then again, i'm not the psychologist here.
So yes, i can be both - or all, if you prefer. More than can, i am both. Which i suppose makes me unique. Lucky me.
Though i have to admit... this does explain a whole lot about how i deal with people. Who knew i'd actually ever get anything out of these silly quizes?
Last website visited:
Mood: hmm
Right now i want...
Occasionally i take personality tests. Yes, more tests... i must miss school. The interesting thing about my tests, however, is that my results differ based on my current situation (project mode, listening to friends, etc).
For example, i just took a(nother) Jung - Myers-Briggs personality test. My results?
I'm an ENTJ, a Rational, person, more commonly known as The Field Marshall. Field Marshalls make up less than 2% of the population.
Curious that, while accurate, especially in certain situations (MUSKET i'm talking to you!), it doesn't begin to cover the other side of my personality: the me that is happy to hang around and help out when being a Field Marshall isn't required. So i took another test, a temperment sorter trying to answer as if i wasn't in the ending stages of shipping an application. The answer?
I'm a ESFJ, a Guardian, specifically a Provider. Another near-rarity, weighing in at 10% of the population.
So how can i be both a Rational and a Guardian (and no, the answer is not that i'm Aisling Grey)?
Here's the thing: to me, this makes complete sense. I will always deal more with the external world than with the internal one (i knew i was a libra!), and i do tend to make plans and organize solutions, there's no helping that.
But i've found that i can choose how i percieve the information from my environment and how i process that information. I would argue that these changes do not have to be made at the same time, but then again, i'm not the psychologist here.
So yes, i can be both - or all, if you prefer. More than can, i am both. Which i suppose makes me unique. Lucky me.
Though i have to admit... this does explain a whole lot about how i deal with people. Who knew i'd actually ever get anything out of these silly quizes?
1 Comments:
Actually, since there are 16 different Myers-Briggs personality types, the average type would make up 6.25% of the population. So ENTJs are relatively rare, while ENFJs are relatively common.
I'm an ISTJ, otherwise known as an "Obsessive-Compulsive Cynic". :-)
Myers-Briggs tests draw general conclusions from very general personality traits, so they're not very useful for individuals. To my mind they're mainly useful as a way to classify personality traits, rather than as a way to gain insight into personalities.